Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10311/1636
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNkomazana, Oathokwa-
dc.contributor.authorMoosa, Shabir-
dc.contributor.authorWojczewski, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Kathryn-
dc.contributor.authorPoppe, Annelien-
dc.contributor.authorPeersman, Wim-
dc.contributor.authorWillcox, Merlin-
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Manfred-
dc.contributor.authorDerese, Anselme-
dc.contributor.authorMant, David-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-10T14:18:52Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-10T14:18:52Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationMoosa, Shabir et al (2013) Why there is an inverse primary-care law in Africa, Lancet Global Health, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 332-333en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-109x-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10311/1636-
dc.description.abstractMany low-income and middle-income countries are now pursuing ambitious plans for universal primary care, but are failing to deliver adequate care quality because of intractable human resource problems—eg, in Uganda in 2009, 44% of health-worker posts were vacant in urban health centres and 57% were vacant in smaller rural health centres.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier; https://www.elsevier.com/en_US
dc.subjectUniversal primary careen_US
dc.subjectinverseen_US
dc.subjectprimary-care lawen_US
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africaen_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.titleWhy there is an inverse primary-care law in Africaen_US
dc.typePublished Articleen_US
dc.linkhttp://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/langlo/PIIS2214-109X(13)70119-0.pdfen_US
Appears in Collections:Research articles (School of Medicine)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Nkomazana_LGH_2013.pdf44.77 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.