Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorapedi, Setumile
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-17T14:05:42Z
dc.date.available2021-08-17T14:05:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-06
dc.identifier.otherhttp://journals.ub.bw/index.php/jolt/article/view/1100en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10311/2136
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the paper is to show how a language with rich agreement inflection like Early Modern English, has null pro subject  allowed in the structural subject position of finite clauses, whereas in a language with poor agreement morphology like Present-day English it is not allowed. It further illustrates that the rich AGR(eement) inflections in Early Modern English serve to identify the null pro subject, since the feature-content of the latter (i.e. the pro) can be recovered from the AGR morpheme on the verb morphology. Following Chomsky’s (1993) Principles & Parameters theory, I show how the nominative Case and agreement features of the (pro) subject are allowed and how the tense features of the verb attract other features from the weak position in Early Modern English.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Botswana, www.ub.ac.bwen_US
dc.relationhttp://journals.ub.bw/index.php/jolt/article/view/1100/686en_US
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2017 Lonaka Journal of Learning and Teachingen_US
dc.sourceLonaka Journal of Learning and Teaching: Vol. 8, No. 1. 2017, 81-92en_US
dc.subjectNull pro subject vs non null subjecten_US
dc.subjectstrong vs weak inflectional positions and featuresen_US
dc.subjectmovement operationen_US
dc.subjectprinciples and parametersen_US
dc.subjecttheoryen_US
dc.subjectraisingen_US
dc.subjectearly modern Englishen_US
dc.subjectrich verb inflectionsen_US
dc.subjectpoor verb inflectionsen_US
dc.titleA null subject in early modern English: a principles and parameter approachen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record