UBRISA

View Item 
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Okavango Research Institute (ORI)
  • Research articles (ORI)
  • View Item
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Okavango Research Institute (ORI)
  • Research articles (ORI)
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The impact of extreme flooding of the okavango river on the livelihood of the molapo farming community of Tubu village, Ngamiland Sub-district, Botswana

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Magole 2005 Impact of.pdf (1.812Mb)
    Date
    2005
    Author
    Magole, L.
    Thapelo, K.
    Publisher
    Botswana Society
    Link
    http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40980409
    Type
    Published Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a study carried out on the impact of the recent (2004) severe flooding of the Okavango River on the livelihood of the molapo (flood recession) farming community of Tubu village in Ngamiland sub-district. Government and NGO disaster relief organisations responded to the floods in panic and desperation while affected communities appeared calm and laid-back. To the extent that they (communities) refused to evacuate flood plains and island settlements to make way for the considerably high and potentially dangerous flood of 2004; the communities' reaction was surprising as the floods were so severe upstream, that they caused damage to property, threatened lives and reduced yields significantly. However, studying the farming community of Tubu revealed that community members have other considerations which make them perceive the inherent risk differently from outsiders. Communities view flooding (whether severe or normal) more as part of the biodiversity production system and a source of livelihood than a destructive force. It was found regarding molapo farming that, first, even under hazardous flooding conditions crop yields are still better compared to those under alternative dryland farming. Secondly, destructive floods occur at 10- to 20-year intervals, making the gamble worthwhile because over time the flood-related benefits outweigh the risks. Thirdly, because the molapo farming communities are poor, other sources of livelihood are not adequately developed to take over from molapo farming. Fourth, the system has evolved into an old tradition which the farmers are not willing to part with. Hence the farmers are adamant that abandoning the production system is not, as yet, an option for them.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10311/949
    Collections
    • Research articles (ORI) [270]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBRISA > Communities & Collections > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > SubjectsThis Collection > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > Subjects

    My Account

    > Login > Register

    Statistics

    > Most Popular Items > Statistics by Country > Most Popular Authors