UBRISA

View Item 
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Education
  • Languages and Social Sciences Education
  • Research articles (Dept of Languages & Social Sciences Education)
  • View Item
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Education
  • Languages and Social Sciences Education
  • Research articles (Dept of Languages & Social Sciences Education)
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Education reform in Botswana: reflections on policy contradictions and paradoxes

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Tabulawa_CE_2009.pdf (1.965Mb)
    Date
    2009-02
    Author
    Tabulawa, R.T.
    Publisher
    Routledge http://www.informaworld.com
    Link
    http://pdfserve.informaworld.com/19243_731385705_908446061.pdf
    Type
    Published Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Literature on globalisation claims that changed global patterns of production and industrial organisation have intensified international economic competition, prompting nations globally to restructure their education systems in an attempt to position themselves favourably in an increasingly competitive economic environment. This is an environment that now requires a new kind of worker, what Castells terms the self-programmable worker. This has put education under pressure to produce the learner-equivalent of the self-programmable worker. This self-programmable learner is characterised by such psychosocial traits as independence of thought, innovativeness, creativity and flexibility. Botswana's Revised National Policy on Education (RNPE) of 1994 represents the country's response to globalisation. It purports to produce the self-programmable learner for an economy undergoing rapid transformation. In this paper I take a critical view of the policy's intent. By analysing two of its central constructs (pre-vocational preparation strategy and the behaviourist model adopted in the review of the curriculum), upon which the production of the self-programmable learner hinges, I conclude that it is unlikely that the preferred learner would be produced. The two constructs are identified as paradoxes in that their effects are most likely to be the opposite of what is intended.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10311/733
    Collections
    • Research articles (Dept of Languages & Social Sciences Education) [38]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBRISA > Communities & Collections > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > SubjectsThis Collection > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > Subjects

    My Account

    > Login > Register

    Statistics

    > Most Popular Items > Statistics by Country > Most Popular Authors