Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNkomazana, Oathokwa
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-10T13:39:06Z
dc.date.available2017-04-10T13:39:06Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-25
dc.identifier.citationNkomazana, O. (2016) Going rural – protracted immersion or toe-wetting: Does it matter? African Journal of Health Professions Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 86en_US
dc.identifier.issn2078-5127
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10311/1634
dc.description.abstractUniversal access to healthcare mandates that all people worldwide have access to comprehensive healthcare services, without suffering financial hardship. However, unless the severe shortages and inequitable distribution of healthcare workers, especially in many low- and middle-income countries, are addressed, universal access will, similar to ‘Health for all by the year 2000’, go down in history as a desirable but unattainable goal. The dearth of healthcare workers follows an ‘inverse care law’, with the direst shortages in areas of greatest need, mostly rural areas. In a bid to address the challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, many new medical schools with larger class sizes have sprung up in the past 20 - 30 years.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHealth and Medical Publishing Group; https://www.saoa.org.za/publications/hpmgen_US
dc.subjectRural healthcareen_US
dc.titleGoing rural – protracted immersion or toe-wetting: Does it matter?en_US
dc.typePublished Articleen_US
dc.linkhttp://www.ajhpe.org.za/index.php/ajhpe/article/view/797en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record