Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTshitenge, Stephane
dc.contributor.authorGaniyu, Adewale
dc.contributor.authorMbuka, Deogratias
dc.contributor.authorShama, Joseph M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-11T07:01:19Z
dc.date.available2017-05-11T07:01:19Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-17
dc.identifier.citationTshitenge, S. et al (2014) The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana. African Journal of Prmary Health Care and Family Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 1-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn2071-2928
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10311/1653
dc.description.abstractAim: The present study aimed: (1) to evaluate the proportion of each diabetic foot (DF) risk category, according to the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) consensus, in patients attending the diabetic clinic in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital (SPGH) and (2) to examine some of the facto rs that may be associated with the progression to higher risk categories such as anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and lipid profile. Methods: A retrospective, cross sectional chart review of patients who had attended the diabetic clinic in SPGH from January 2013 to December 2013 was performed. Patients were included if they had undergone a foot examination. Patients with amputation due to accident were excluded. The DF risk category was assessed by determining the proportion of patients in each of four risk categories, as described by the IWGDF consensus. Results: The study encompassed 144 records from patients reviewed for foot examination from January to December 2013. Patients’ ages were between 16 and 85 years, 46 (40%) were male and 98 (60%) were female. The majority (122, [85%]) of patients were in DF risk category 0, whilst a limited number of patients were classified in risk category 1 (10, [6.9%]), risk category 2 (7, [4.9%]) and risk category 3 (5, [3.5%]). Most of the patients had the type 2 diabetes mellitus (139, [97%; 95% CI 92% − 99%]). Patients’ ages were associated with the progressively higher DF risk categories. The adjusted odd ratio was 1.1 (95% CI 1.03−1.14; p = 0.004). Conclusion: The present study revealed that about 15% of patients attending the SPGH diabetic clinic were categorised in higher risk groups for diabetic foot; patients’ ages were linked to the higher DF risk categories.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSIS, http://aosis.co.za/en_US
dc.subjectDiabetic foot risksen_US
dc.subjectInternational Working Group on the Diabetic Footen_US
dc.subjectanthropometric measurementsen_US
dc.subjectblood pressureen_US
dc.subjectglycosylated haemoglobinen_US
dc.subjectlipid profileen_US
dc.titleThe diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswanaen_US
dc.typePublished Articleen_US
dc.linkhttp://www.phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/610en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record